{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Le Blog GERESO","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.gereso.com\/actualites","author_name":"\u00c9quipe GERESO","author_url":"https:\/\/www.gereso.com\/actualites\/author\/gereso\/","title":"Actualit\u00e9 jurisprudentielle relative \u00e0 la fonction publique - Le Blog GERESO","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"lSpAdDJRhA\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.gereso.com\/actualites\/2023\/12\/04\/actualite-jurisprudentielle-fonction-publique-2\/\">Actualit\u00e9 jurisprudentielle relative \u00e0 la fonction publique<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.gereso.com\/actualites\/2023\/12\/04\/actualite-jurisprudentielle-fonction-publique-2\/embed\/#?secret=lSpAdDJRhA\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"\u00ab\u00a0Actualit\u00e9 jurisprudentielle relative \u00e0 la fonction publique\u00a0\u00bb &#8212; Le Blog GERESO\" data-secret=\"lSpAdDJRhA\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.gereso.com\/actualites\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n","thumbnail_url":"https:\/\/www.gereso.com\/actualites\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/actualite-jurisprudentielle-fonction-publique.jpg","thumbnail_width":600,"thumbnail_height":400,"description":"La proc\u00e9dure d\u2019abandon de poste ne peut s\u2019appliquer \u00e0 un agent contractuel de droit public Dans un arr\u00eat du 3&nbsp;novembre&nbsp;2023, le Conseil d&rsquo;Etat a jug\u00e9 que la proc\u00e9dure de radiation pour abandon de poste ne peut pas \u00eatre mise en \u0153uvre \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e9gard d\u2019un agent contractuel de droit public, qui ne rejoint pas les nouvelles [&hellip;]"}